Haman

[_thetruth]

Originally posted by Theja
Sorry, I found nothing that corrects the errors of Muhammad. All the site did is to confuse the Muslims and keep them in a false comfort that the Koran has no errors. Just because someone assembled a response does not mean the error should be overlooked. History cannot be changed.

Saddam Hussein and Mehmet II lived in different times. Likewise Pharoah and Haman lived in different times. Anyone with academic integrity should admit and go with the historical facts.

Poor you you are the only one who is right well good luck to you so what do we do start reading the bible that has 50.000 errors? instead or perhaps we should all go backward and all believe in Adam and his God

[rocam]

Prominent Orientalists have not been able to correctly identify the Haman of the Qur'an, and have thus questioned his historicity. They have suggested that the appearance of Haman in the Qur'anic story of Moses and Pharaoh has resulted from a misreading of the Bible which moved Haman from the Persian court of King Ahasuerus to the Egyptian court of the Pharaoh.

Same story as what you posted in the quotes above. Obviously you have not read the article. The writers did not just “assemble” an answer, they came up with valid facts to back up their argument. On the other hand you just like to chant that it can’t be true because the Bible said so

Stop using the word academic integrity because you have none.

"Basically, the Christian missionaries' argument is circular. According to them, the Bible says such-and-such and the Qur'ân says such-and-such; therefore it follows that it is a contradiction in the Qur'ân. Since the Bible says so, it must be true. Proof is not necessary, Belief is sufficient.
No attempt is made by the Christian missionaries to show that the Biblical account is historical and the Qur'ânic one a legend."

[_thetruth]

Or better