New celeb news thread!

[razrif]

Just what we are missing!!! First up Madge as a hernia....read more here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060216/en_nm/madonna_dc

next live from This Morning.....Someones dog napped Lionel Blair's doggie! He's devastated....the dogs deaf ....More Tomorrow

Oooow he's in tears!
Theres a reward Lotfi

[Anisa]

You nutter

[razrif]

Ex goat herder on GMTV in the morning!!!

[razrif]

Jacko still in poo poo up to his nonesense nose!!
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - An appeals court on Wednesday refused to reinstate an order granting
Michael Jackson sole custody of his two children with ex-wife Debbie Rowe.
ADVERTISEMENT

California's 2nd District Court of Appeals said that while Rowe signed away her parental rights in 2001 to the 47-year-old performer's two oldest children, Michael Jr. and Paris, it found that the judge in that case did not properly handle the proceedings.

Rowe, who was married to Jackson from 1997 to 1999 but never lived with the self-styled King of Pop, persuaded a Los Angeles Superior Court judge to overturn the child custody agreement in 2004 on legal grounds.

Rowe's petition cited accusations of child molestation against Jackson and his association with the Nation of Islam, whose members briefly provided security for the singer during the trial.

The case ended with Jackson's acquittal in June of 2005.

After the lower court refused Jackson's request to overturn that order, he appealed to the 2nd District, which ruled against the entertainer and held that the original order terminating Rowe's parental rights was voided.

Rowe, who was working as a medical assistant for a dermatologist when she met Jackson, was called as a prosecution witness in his trial but defended him on the stand, saying that he was kind, selfless and "generous to a fault."

Jackson, who has spent much of his time since the trial in Bahrain, has a third child, Prince Michael II, by an unknown mother.

He was married to
Lisa Marie Presley, daughter of
Elvis Presley, in the mid-1990s, but the couple had no children together.

[razrif]

LONDON (Reuters) -
Elton John won undisclosed libel damages and an apology from a British newspaper on Thursday over a story which said the singer had acted "in a self-important, arrogant and rude manner" at one of his
AIDS charity functions

At London's High Court, John's lawyer told the judge the rock star had sued over a 2005 article in the Sunday Times headlined "Rock royals get too grand" about his AIDS Foundation Summer Ball.

The story said the singer had issued a "bizarre and absurd edict to guests at his annual charity fundraising White Tie and Tiara summer ball not to address him unless spoken to."

Hanna Basha said the story had caused her client considerable embarrassment and distress, particularly because he feared it would be damaging to his fundraising efforts.

She said that Times Newspapers Ltd now accepted that the allegation was untrue and should not have been made. It has agreed to publish an apology, and pay damages to John which he will donate to his AIDS Foundation.

The publishers will also pay his legal costs.

"As soon as the defendant found out the story was untrue -- it had been picked up from another newspaper -- it immediately apologized to Sir Elton and it is happy to repeat that apology here today," the Times Newspaper's lawyer Alastair Brett said.

The singer set up the Elton John AIDS Foundation in 1992. The White Tie and Tiara Ball has raised at least 3 million pounds a year for it.

[razrif]

Justin is bedding Becca tonight
thats 3 times this week
Its not right

[razrif]

and Darlene is being even naughtier!