35 marines killed in heroic battle

[Tawfiq]

Iraqi liberation fighters killed 35 american marines in a heroic battle.
This shows there are still iraqis who refuse foreign occupation of their land. It looks like the iraqi resistance will liberate iraq from american occupation.
Lets all pray in support of iraqi resistance fighters.

I really find no higher honor than in a man who fights to the death to defend his land, people and family, despite all odds, and despite the disproportionate and vast military superiority of the enemy.
God bless iraqi insurgents / liberation fighters and.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/26/in...rtner=homepage

[voltaires_priest]

"Liberate" Iraq and replace the US troops with what?

I was opposed to the Iraq war as you know, but it seems to me that the "resistance" aren't a lot more savoury than the occupiers.


V

[_thetruth]

Difficult to judge wthout looking at facts straight from the sourse. but no one can deny that day by day the USA/UK and others are realising what Grave error the war was.
Let recap:
Introduction
US Greed trained Binladden and armed him to kill people
2001 he turned against them

issue 1
1-Bin ladden the idiot killed Innocents ~3000
Response
US waged a war and killed millions of innocents who had no connection to their Agents they trained
Issue 2
Bin ladden still alive and kiking and no weapons found in Iraq and bush still smiles and drink wine while innocent survivors can not understand why one day they were able to walk free and now they are told they are being liberated by at a price?????????????????????????
the war is still on because of G W bush Mistakes
3 years later most Prisoners arrested for no apparent reason by the USA and the Brits have now been released without a charge????????????????
No Law suit took place to make Bush and Blair pay for the killings of innocents no justice done and we are back to square zero with a devastating consequences
I think they need to be killed just like the way they killed innocents
------------Eye for Eye-------------------------

[voltaires_priest]

As I said, Tihad, I opposed the Iraq war.

But... I feel no obligation to offer support to the "resistance" as a consequence of my stance, and I have never accepted the idea of "an eye for an eye". Not only does it not work in war, it has never worked anywhere.


V

[Tawfiq]

Originally posted by voltaires_priest
"Liberate" Iraq and replace the US troops with what?

I was opposed to the Iraq war as you know, but it seems to me that the "resistance" aren't a lot more savoury than the occupiers.
V

US troops are the reason there is resistance. They should be replaced with Iraqi troops (previous army and islamic resistance members). Anybody except the dreaded americans / israelis.

The resistance are the true liberators, because they fight in their land against a foreign occupation. And like every other liberation effort in history, there will always be excesses and mistakes. But the bottom line is this: they have the morale duty and the legitimate right to resist the evil american occupation.

[Tawfiq]

One question.
Do iraqis have the right to resist occupation? Yes or NO?

You don't need to elaborate on how a resistance should look like, or what forms it should take.
Just this please. Do occupied people have the right to fight back?
Yes or NO ?

[_thetruth]

VP
eye for eye is the one way to teach some people that evil can only be araze in a similar manner Biblical law.

T
if a person enter someone else house the intruder should expect anything