Quote:
Originally posted by rocam
[b]
Quote:
Originally posted by voltaires_priest
So if you quote from websites that have an ideological bias, you must therefore be biased yourself?
V
|
When you quote an article from a source and present it as fact, there’s a big chance you consider that source reliable or at least somewhat reliable.
I never use worldnetdaily articles to back up my claims because I think that it’s junk.
|
This is what was reported to be posted on "Paltalk" by WorldNetDaily:
-----------------------------
"Know this, Ahmed_love_Jesus, we tracked you and being in America will not help you. Your blood is lawful and we will kill you soon.
If you were with me I would have killed you.
I will know where you are and kill you someday.
Ahmed_Love_Jesus, by the life of your mother's [obscenity deleted], your blood is lawful. We know where you are in America and we will slaughter you like the lamb that you worship."
-----------------------------
Either it was posted on Paltalk or it was not. It doesn't matter WHO reported it as being posted. If the threat WAS posted on Paltalk, then WorldNetDaily reported the truth.
Rocam,
Stop trying to play "Gotcha" with DV. You will lose.
